Thursday, January 7, 2010

Retirements of Dodd, Dorgan & Ritter place Democrats in precarious position


The list of notable retiring Democrats continues to grow. How much pain will be inflicted upon the current party in power however remains to be seen.

Chris Dodd is latest to join the ranks of the soon to be unemployed within the Democratic ranks. 2009 was not an easy year in the personal life for the Connecticut Senator. A close friend to Ted Kennedy for many years Dodd was said to be devastated by the liberal icon’s passing last August from brain cancer. Dodd himself was diagnosed and treated for early-stage prostate cancer last summer and was at the forefront of tough issues such as financial and health care reform. Yet the political realities were likely a factor in the 65-year old Senator’s decision to step down at the end of his term in January of 2011.

Rasmussen Reports indicated that Dodd was trailing in the polls against all three of his likely Republican match ups for the fall. The same publication pegged the Connecticut Senator with just a 19% “very” favorable rating against over twice as many (39%) who view him very unfavorably. To trail as a well-known Democrat in the politcally left-leaning Constitution State, one that helped Barack Obama to a 23-point win in 2008 and still hands the President a 57% approval rating, is rather alarming. Even Dodd’s own internals showed him fighting an uphill battle against Republicans in November.

With Dodd’s personal and political struggles essentially forcing a retirement concession could the door now be opened for another Democratic candidate to improve their party’s chances in the fall? The New York Times has been reporting that those shoes will likely be filled by highly popular Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. Early polling conducted by Quinnipiac last summer showed Blumenthal receiving a sky-high 79% approval rating from Connecticut voters. His entrance in the race or that of a handful of other Democrats in what FiveThirtyEight.com's Nate Silver calls “a deep bench” in the New England “blue” state shifts the prospects of victory from difficult to likely.

Democratic prospects in North Dakota meanwhile are considerably less rosey with the recently announced retirement of Senator Byron Dorgan. Seemingly the only candidate at this point with a chance to retain the vacant seat for the Democrats would be longtime state representative Earl Pomeroy. Fortunately for the GOP popular sitting Governor John Hoeven looks primed to run for the Senate position. Hoeven is considered by many to be a moderate Republican, particularly on economic issues, and reflects a North Dakota electorate far more to the political right than that of the previously mentioned Connecticut. Hoeven consistently polls as one of the most popular Governors in the nation and Rasmussen recently showed him with a 58-36% advantage over Senator Dorgan in their hypothetical match up.

On the topic of Governor’s who will not be running for any sort of office in 2010 comes Bill Ritter of Colorado. Ritter took over the position of Governor from exiting two-term Republican Bill Owens in 2007 but has decided not to run for his own second term. While not as desperate looking a situation for the Democrats as that which is unfolding in North Dakota Ritter was behind one potential Republican and in a dogfight with another according to recent Rasmussen polling. Likely nominee and current GOP Congressman Scott McInnis was ahead 48-40% and Ritter’s approval rating with Coloradans has dropped into the negatives in recent months.

“For the good of the party” could be claimed by the stepping down of Dodd whose seat is likely to be filled by another Democrat. Not so in the instances of North Dakota and Colorado where the Democrats continue to lose clout after a difficult 2009 has put their solid national majorities in jeopardy heading into 2010. Still if there was ever a time when a party out of power could actually fail to make up substantial ground on the unpopular opposition in control of government 2010 and the GOP might be just that.

Even RNC chairman Michael Steele recently admitted "not this year" to a question of whether the Republican Party can retake control of the House in 2010. Both parties at present are historically unpopular with voters. The Democrats appear vulnerable and will be forced to traverse a treacherous path in order to keep anything even resembling their current majorities in tact. The Republicans meanwhile are still licking their wounds from three years of setbacks and by most assessments are a party divided. The political midterm war of 2010 may very well be fought on two fronts. The typical dueling between Democrats and Republicans will take center stage but a battle against attrition for both parties could play a major role in the outcome.


AP PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS / FILE

Monday, January 4, 2010

Poll: Despite difficult 2000s most Americans hold positive outlook toward years ahead

READ FULL STORY HERE
In spite of coming off a particularly rough decade and uncertain of the years ahead most Americans are optimistic about their country’s future in the 2010s and beyond.

63% of the American public has an optimistic outlook for the U.S. during the next twenty-years. Just 34% are pessimistic according to a new survey released by USA Today/Gallup. The level of enthusiasm being expressed while not as strong as it was heading into the 1990s or 2000s is noticeably higher than it was near the end of the 70s. Embroiled in a decade of economic, political and social turmoil just slightly more than half of Americans (51%) claimed optimism heading into the 1980s – 39% meanwhile were pessimistic about the next twenty-years at that time.

Today’s level of optimism is lower never the less than its recent peak years of the early-90s and 2000s. Gallup has asked responders the question at different times in different years. The current poll was conducted last month and the poll for the 1980s was done in August of 1979. The poll question for last decade however wasn’t created until October of 2000 and the 90s version wasn’t released until May of 1991. Still it’s clear that optimism towards the days ahead was highest in the previous two decades. Virtually identical totals in the 90s and 2000s averaged 78-79% optimism against just 19-20% pessimism.

While levels of optimism outdistance pessimism in each decade public feelings are mostly reserved to the side of caution. Just seven-percent of the total 63% who claim an optimistic outlook for the next twenty-years define their feelings as being “very” optimistic. That is similar to the eight-percent who claimed to be very optimistic early last decade and the ten-percent recorded in 1991 when general optimism reached record levels.

There is widening gap between political parties on the topic according to the Gallup survey. With the White House and Congress in their favor Democrats are currently far more optimistic (77%) about the coming years than Republicans (50%). Independents meanwhile float predictably in between and similar to overall figures with a 62-36% optimist-pessimist split in opinion. This current 27-point gap is vastly wider than what was recorded between the two major parties in other recent decades. There was a nine-point gap in the early-90s when 85% of Republicans and 76% of Democrats had an optimistic outlook of the future. The difference was eight-percentage points in October of 2000 when Democrats (83%) were marginally more optimistic than Republicans (75%). Even in the tumultuous late-70s the gap between parties was a narrow seven-percent. Republicans (59%) were surprisingly more optimistic than Democrats (52%) at the time despite being out of political power.
The wide gap at present goes hand in hand with many claims being made by pollsters and analysts who see an America more socially divided and politically polarized now than ever before. As Gallup points out the expectation from the late-70s when overall optimism was at just 51% would be that Republicans both out of power and frustrated with Democratic control of the White House and Congress to be far more pessimistic than their fellow Democrats. Yet the narrow seven-point gap flies in the face of that assumption.

The political environment clearly has much to do with general optimism and pessimism. Perhaps many Republicans in late-1979 were hopeful of a Republican comeback which sure enough took place with the landslide Presidential victory of Ronald Reagan and control of the Senate by the GOP for the first in 28-years in 1980. Today there are record levels of displeasure with their government being recorded by the American people.

The past two President’s Barack Obama and George W. Bush featured highly partisan levels of support and opposition between parties. Ronald Reagan’s 1980 victory by nearly ten-percentage points included 84% support from fellow Republicans. The defeated President Carter pulled in just under two-thirds support (66%) from Democrats, the difference a clearly decisive factor in his loss. Bill Clinton’s 8.5% victory over Bob Dole in 1996 saw the support of 78% of Democrats favoring the sitting President and 86% of Republicans siding with Dole.

The polarization between parties is most evident in recent years with around 90% of Democrats and Republicans in lock step behind their representative candidate. In 2008 for example President Obama drew 89% of the Democratic vote and John McCain won 90% of Republicans. Obama’s better than seven-point margin of victory nationally hinged more on strong Democratic turnout and support from independents than the securing of a decisive edge between parties achieved by the likes of Ronald Reagan 28-years prior.

In addition to the range of differences between parties in terms of optimism the outlook also tends to vary between age and income. Youthful optimism is abundant today with 75% aged 18-29 expressing a positive outlook for the next twenty-years. Just 54% of elders aged 65 and over agree however with age groups in between mirroring closely the overall percentages. Lower income families are not surprisingly less optimistic on the whole as well. Just 52% of households making $30,000 or less hold an optimistic outlook against around two-thirds of those earning higher than that particular income level.

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Poll: Pennsylvania & Delaware vulnerable for Democrats in 2010 Senate race

READ FULL STORY HERE

The start of the New Year hopefully brings renewed optimism amongst Americans. The 2000s were a difficult time and the final two years of the decade were especially a struggle. In Washington meanwhile it’s business as usual. 2010 marks a crucial midterm-voting year where Republicans look to reverse recent loses all the while the Democrats try to solidify their political majorities.

Nate Silver and the folks atfivethirtyeight.com recently ranked each Senate race by the likelihood for a takeover from the opposing party. All factors such as low approval ratings for incumbents, primary challenges and retirements were taken into consideration.

At the top of the list ranks a Philadelphia neighbor to the south, the First State of Delaware. Beau Biden has not declared his candidacy for the state’s at-large Senate race since his father Joe’s resignation of the position earlier this year to assume the role of Vice President. If he does declare we could have an interesting race on our hands. If not it appears to be a virtual walkover for popular Congressman and former Governor Mike Castle. Currently FiveThirtyEight places Castle’s chances of beating Biden at around 55%, but nearly 100% over a lesser-known Democrat if the VP’s son decides to remain at his post of Attorney General.

Locally all the talk is about the high profile Pennsylvania race between Republican Pat Toomey and the winner of a primary battle featuring longtime Senator Arlen Specter and two-term Congressman Joe Sestak. Nate Silver claims that in an “ordinary” election cycle Toomey would have difficulty beating either Democratic candidate especially Specter. In a year where Democrats will be forced into a hard sell of their message to a skeptical American public however Toomey seems primed for an upset opportunity. Polls in the Keystone State show a virtual tossup between Specter and Toomey with Sestak lingering close behind.

Shifting attention away from local politics to the state of Connecticut high-ranking Senator Chris Dodd is in serious trouble. Recently an internal poll placed him behind representative Rob Simmons by five-points. National polls have Dodd even further behind and there are indications that he might not even win his party’s nomination for 2010.

Concern for Democrats range throughout the top of the FiveThirtyEight list of vulnerable incumbents. Senate majority leader Harry Reid faces huge challenges in his home state of Nevada. The likelihood that Reid will lose his race continues to grow but there are some reasons for optimism as Nate Silver’s website points out. Reid has a significant war chest full of cash on hand, the perception of his effectiveness should improve in the event that he passes health care reform, the Democrats control the party machine of Nevada and Republicans in the Silver State remain untested.

Elsewhere Blanche Lincoln has a battle on her hands in the state of Arkansas and wisely strayed from the limelight during the health care debate. In Colorado Michael Bennet is said to be vulnerable but Silver suggests that more polling is needed before the race can truly be labeled.

While clearly sitting in better position for numerous takeovers the Republicans are also vulnerable in their fair share of races. Democrat Robin Carnahan continues to hold a stable lead over Republican opponent Roy Blunt who FiveThirtyEight claims is “the wrong kind of candidate for this [election] cycle.” In Ohio Rob Portman holds a modest lead over two Democratic candidates in a state that has drifted away from President Obama and Democrats over the past year. Still Nate Silver sees a tight race, as Portman will have to battle his critics and rid the perception of his ties to Bush-era policies.

If Libertarian Rand Paul beats moderate Republican Trey Grayson for the nomination in Kentucky indicators suggest a tight race in a state where Libertarian talking points are not as well received as in other parts of the country. The open seat vacated by retiring Senator and former Phillies Hall of Fame pitcher Jim Bunning should be hotly contested throughout the campaign season. The race in New Hampshire meanwhile will also be viewed with much anticipation as the open seat in a bellwether state could go a long way in dictating the overall national trend this November.

Other races where polling is competitive are in the states of Illinois, North Carolina, North Dakota and Louisiana where Republicans appear just as vulnerable as Democrats. There seems to be more stability elsewhere in many of the 36 or more seats that will be open in 2010. What makes the upcoming election all the more fascinating as an indicator of national trends are the 36-races up for election split in half with exactly eighteen currently held by Democrats and the GOP each.

Other notable publications in addition to FiveThirtyEight tracking these races include Larry J. Sabato’s Chrystal Ball, Cook Political Report, CQ Politics, the Rothenberg Political Report, Swing State Project and Campaign Diaries. Using the six aforementioned sources as a guide there are seven states (HI, IN, MD, NY, OR, VT, WA) where the Democrats are considered safe winners in 2010 and nine (AL, AK, AR, ID, KS, OK, SC, SD, UT) where the Republican Party is overwhelmingly poised for victory.

New York and California are likely for the Democrats this fall with Florida, Iowa and Georgia fitting that same description for the GOP. Fifteen other states appear to lean slightly one way or to the other or are considered completely up for grabs. The Democrats currently enjoy a twenty-seat advantage in the U.S. Senate after two caucusing independents are taken into consideration. With at least 36-races on the table for 2010 could the Republican Party be looking for that magic number 24?

PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS / HARRY HAMBURG

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Poll: Football fans down on the BCS, rank Eagles 7th most popular NFL team

READ FULL STORY HERE
College football fans are down on the BCS and the Eagles are the seventh most popular team in the NFL.

According to a new poll from Quinnipiac University 63% of adults who identify as being a fan of NCAA football would like the Bowl Championship Series (BCS) replaced with a playoff format in vein of the popular “March Madness” college basketball or other systems used to determine a champion in pro sports. However nearly as many hold a favorable view of the current BCS format (43%) as those who see it unfavorably (45%).

Americans are also split on the role of government intervention into the college league. 45% think it to be a good idea for Congress to force the NCAA to declare a national champion on the field by way of a playoff format but 48% disagree. Overall 18% of adults according to the Quinnipiac poll of 1,849 surveyed say they are “very” interested in college football. An additional 28% suggest they are at least somewhat interested with more than half (54%) not interested at all.

Broken down by political party there are close similarities between those NCAA football fans when offering their opinion on the current state of the BCS and whether it ought to be replaced. The number of Republicans who are in favor of a new format to decide national champions (63%) is identical to the overall number. Democrats and independents are in favor of a systematic change by 65%. Similarly the 43% of adults overall who hold a favorable view of the BCS are broken down by 43% of Democrats and 39% of independents and Republicans. (That the poll is able to generate a total of 43% from three components equaling just 43, 39 and 39% is likely a reflection of the +/- 3.2% margin of error.)

There is a difference in the number of adults considering themselves to be college football fans by political affiliation however. 55% of Republicans are at least “somewhat” interested in the sport against 49% of Democrats and just 47% of independents who claim to be fans. Older adults 55-years and up tend to be slightly more interested than young adults under-35. Men on average (55%) are also more interested in NCAA football than women (38%).

The more partisan issue is not surprisingly reflected by the number of those for or against government intervention. Considerably more Democrats (54%) than Republicans (38%) would like to see Congress essentially force the NCAA to adopt a playoff format for football. Interestingly independents are less likely (35%) than either party to believe Congress playing a role in the issue to be a good idea. President Obama is on the record as stating he favors a playoff system. Most observers believe it possible for at least a four team tournament take place. Pro football uses a twelve team format to decide its Super Bowl winner each season with six teams from each conference reaching the postseason.

Switching to the topic of pro football for a moment a Harris Interactive poll from October rated the Dallas Cowboys as the most popular team in the NFL and the Philadelphia Eagles seventh. Those two teams will meet Sunday in Dallas to decide the winner of NFC East and perhaps who will be awarded a first round bye week in the playoffs. Slightly more than half (51%) of adults say they regularly follow professional football making it the nation’s most popular sporting league. Baby boomers aged 45-63 are most likely to follow the NFL (55%) and men do so more than women by a margin of 64-39%. African American adults (63%) top both white’s (50%) and Hispanics (51%) in the number of pro football fans with Republicans (59%) seemingly a bit more interested than Democrats (50%) or independents (51%).

Results from the Harris poll surveying the popularity of teams dates back to 1998. Over that period the Eagles were most popular in 2004 and 2005 in the midst of their most recent Super Bowl run ranking them fifth. Their lowest ranking of 21st was in 1999, the first season of Coach Andy Reid and quarterback Donovan McNabb as the Eagles were regrouping from a franchise worst thirteen loses the previous season. The Cowboys meanwhile rank as the league’s most popular team for a third-straight year and since 1998 they have never dropped below fourth in the survey.

Rounding out the top-ten are the Pittsburgh Steelers, Chicago Bears, Indianapolis Colts, New England Patriots, Green Bay Packers, Eagles at seven, New York Giants, Tennessee Titans and Minnesota Vikings. The Jacksonville Jaguars who have struggled with their attendance this season despite being in the playoff hunt are ranked as least popular team for the fourth time in five years. The biggest jump in positioning was a whopping fourteen spots by the Atlanta Falcons from 27th to 13th. The biggest fall was sustained by the Brett Favre-less New York Jets dropping eleven positions from a ninth place tie to number twenty. The Eagles meanwhile are up one spot from the last two years and currently at number seven rank as the most popular NFL team to have never won a Super Bowl.

Lastly Harris asked the question in October who fans thought was the team most likely to win this season’s Super Bowl. At the time 19% thought the Steelers were poised for a repeat, 17% considered the Patriots most likely with the Indianapolis Colts at seven-percent and a distant third place. The Dallas Cowboys were next at six-percent and rounding out the top-five were the Eagles, Giants and Bears all at five-percent. The NFL landscape has changed considerably since then however. The Steelers at 8-7 are battling for their playoff lives and the Patriots have had an inconsistent 10-5 season that none the less has won them a division title. The Colts at 14-1 meanwhile have the best record in football, the Cowboys and Eagles as previously mentioned will battle for their division crown this weekend and the Giants and Bears are both officially eliminated from the playoff picture.

PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS / MICHAEL PEREZ

Monday, December 28, 2009

Poll: Winners and losers for 2009

With only four days until the New Year Americans are taking a look back at the year that was in 2009. Gallup released the results of a survey this morning asking responders to pick their winners and losers of the past twelve months.

Although it was a difficult first year, by most accounts, for the President a majority of Americans consider 2009 a win for both Obama and any number of high profile individuals associated with him. 58% consider the President to be a political “winner” this year. His wife, First Lady Michelle scores even higher with 73% of that opinion. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is considered a winner by seven of ten Americans and newly confirmed Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor tops out at 57% with just 24% believing her to be a “loser” in 2009.

The First Lady has received positive approval over the entire year and Hillary Clinton seems to have bounced back from a hard fought losing campaign for President in 2008 to successfully fill the role of Obama’s Secretary of the State in 2009. Sonia Sotomayor has far and away the highest number of Americans (19%) unsure of her standing as a winner or loser for the year. Her nomination and confirmation as Supreme Court Justice while surely viewed as a high honor by most is possibly undercut by the negative reaction of many to her controversial rulings in the New Haven firefighters case.

As for President Obama the 58% who feel he pulled out an overall victory for 2009 closely mirrors his average approval rating for the year. Obama pushed through his economic stimulus package earlier in the year and currently on the verge of passing health care reform as the decade comes to a close. In the meantime his approval ratings hampered by controversial legislation have declined considerably in recently months and Gallup currently measures the President’s job approval at 51%.
With only four days until the New Year Americans are taking a look back at the year that was in 2009. Gallup released the results of a survey this morning asking responders to pick their winners and losers of the past twelve months.

Although it was a difficult first year, by most accounts, for the President a majority of Americans consider 2009 a win for both Obama and any number of high profile individuals associated with him. 58% consider the President to be a political “winner” this year. His wife, First Lady Michelle scores even higher with 73% of that opinion. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is considered a winner by seven of ten Americans and newly confirmed Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor tops out at 57% with just 24% believing her to be a “loser” in 2009.

The First Lady has received positive approval over the entire year and Hillary Clinton seems to have bounced back from a hard fought losing campaign for President in 2008 to successfully fill the role of Obama’s Secretary of the State in 2009. Sonia Sotomayor has far and away the highest number of Americans (19%) unsure of her standing as a winner or loser for the year. Her nomination and confirmation as Supreme Court Justice while surely viewed as a high honor by most is possibly undercut by the negative reaction of many to her controversial rulings in the New Haven firefighters case.

As for President Obama the 58% who feel he pulled out an overall victory for 2009 closely mirrors his average approval rating for the year. Obama pushed through his economic stimulus package earlier in the year and currently on the verge of passing health care reform as the decade comes to a close. In the meantime his approval ratings hampered by controversial legislation have declined considerably in recently months and Gallup currently measures the President’s job approval at 51%.

The so-called “losers” for 2009 include Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, South Carolina politicians Joe Wilson and Mark Sanford, the Republicans in Congress and the White House party crashers.

Pelosi is viewed as a political loser by half (50%) of Americans and a winner by 38%. The view of Republicans in Congress is nearly identical with 38% thinking them winners against 52% who consider them political losers. Republicans appear to have unsuccessfully attempted to derail a key piece of President Obama’s health care legislation but the 38% who consider them winners in 2009 does prevail over their current job approval ratings according to most polls.

Congressman Joe Wilson who was attacked for his “you lie” comment towards the President at a joint session is viewed as a loser by 61% of the public against just 29% who feel he was a winner in 2009. Fellow South Carolinian and Governor Mark Sanford who is under state ethics examination after admitting to an extramarital affair is a loser in the mind of 63% of the public. Just 12% consider him to be a winner with one in four having no opinion. Similarly the stunt pulled by White House party crashers Tareq and Michaele Salahi has them viewed positively by just 16% of Americans with 70% considering them biggest “losers” for ’09.

There is a considerably large gray area as recorded by Gallup in the public opinion of Sarah Palin, Ben Bernanke, Harry Reid and Glenn Beck. Palin has struggled in the minds of the public through most of 2009, coming off of a defeat in the last November’s Presidential election and her surprising resignation as Alaskan Governor earlier this year. Palin remains popular in many circles however and her recent autobiography was a best seller. Currently Palin is labeled as a winner by 46% of the public and a loser by 49%.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” for 2009 but seems to have split public opinion. 37% consider the year a win for the chairman against 35% who do not with a high number (28%) not holding an opinion. Those figures are essentially flipped for conservative talk show host Glenn Beck, the source of another Time Magazine cover this year. Beck is a winner in the eyes of 35% of the public, a loser with 37% and like Bernanke does not draw an opinion from 28%. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid actually fairs similar to House leader Nancy Pelosi although a far higher number of the public (27%) has no opinion of him. With a 31-42% winner to loser margin Reid’s net deficit of eleven-percentage points is equal to that of Pelosi.

As Gallup is quick to point out partisan feelings dominate the perceptions of each individual in this survey. The narrowest divide between parties comes when rating Michelle Obama and even in her case there is a considerable gap. 96% of Democrats think the First Lady was a winner in 2009 against less than half of Republicans (48%) and seven in ten independents who agree. Twice as many Democrats (90%) think Secretary of the State Hillary Clinton is a winner than Republicans (45%) and independents (72%) remain positive towards the former Senator. Sarah Palin has weaker support from her own party with just a little more than three-quarters (76%) thinking her a winner in 2009. Democrats are particularly harsh with just 21% agreeing with that assessment and less than half of independents (45%) also believe 2009 to have been a good year for Sarah.

Not surprisingly the sharpest division between parties comes when rating President Obama, the highest profile of any of the aforementioned. 92% of Democrats see Obama as a winner for 2009 but just 22% of Republicans agree. Perhaps a good omen for the President heading into 2010 is the 56% of independents, just short of his overall average of 58%, consider Obama a winner during his first year in office.

The so-called “losers” for 2009 include Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, South Carolina politicians Joe Wilson and Mark Sanford, the Republicans in Congress and the White House party crashers.

Pelosi is viewed as a political loser by half (50%) of Americans and a winner by 38%. The view of Republicans in Congress is nearly identical with 38% thinking them winners against 52% who consider them political losers. Republicans appear to have unsuccessfully attempted to derail a key piece of President Obama’s health care legislation but the 38% who consider them winners in 2009 does prevail over their current job approval ratings according to most polls.

Congressman Joe Wilson who was attacked for his “you lie” comment towards the President at a joint session is viewed as a loser by 61% of the public against just 29% who feel he was a winner in 2009. Fellow South Carolinian and Governor Mark Sanford who is under state ethics examination after admitting to an extramarital affair is a loser in the mind of 63% of the public. Just 12% consider him to be a winner with one in four having no opinion. Similarly the stunt pulled by White House party crashers Tareq and Michaele Salahi has them viewed positively by just 16% of Americans with 70% considering them biggest “losers” for ’09.

There is a considerably large gray area as recorded by Gallup in the public opinion of Sarah Palin, Ben Bernanke, Harry Reid and Glenn Beck. Palin has struggled in the minds of the public through most of 2009, coming off of a defeat in the last November’s Presidential election and her surprising resignation as Alaskan Governor earlier this year. Palin remains popular in many circles however and her recent autobiography was a best seller. Currently Palin is labeled as a winner by 46% of the public and a loser by 49%.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke was Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” for 2009 but seems to have split public opinion. 37% consider the year a win for the chairman against 35% who do not with a high number (28%) not holding an opinion. Those figures are essentially flipped for conservative talk show host Glenn Beck, the source of another Time Magazine cover this year. Beck is a winner in the eyes of 35% of the public, a loser with 37% and like Bernanke does not draw an opinion from 28%. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid actually fairs similar to House leader Nancy Pelosi although a far higher number of the public (27%) has no opinion of him. With a 31-42% winner to loser margin Reid’s net deficit of eleven-percentage points is equal to that of Pelosi.

As Gallup is quick to point out partisan feelings dominate the perceptions of each individual in this survey. The narrowest divide between parties comes when rating Michelle Obama and even in her case there is a considerable gap. 96% of Democrats think the First Lady was a winner in 2009 against less than half of Republicans (48%) and seven in ten independents who agree. Twice as many Democrats (90%) think Secretary of the State Hillary Clinton is a winner than Republicans (45%) and independents (72%) remain positive towards the former Senator. Sarah Palin has weaker support from her own party with just a little more than three-quarters (76%) thinking her a winner in 2009. Democrats are particularly harsh with just 21% agreeing with that assessment and less than half of independents (45%) also believe 2009 to have been a good year for Sarah.

Not surprisingly the sharpest division between parties comes when rating President Obama, the highest profile of any of the aforementioned. 92% of Democrats see Obama as a winner for 2009 but just 22% of Republicans agree. Perhaps a good omen for the President heading into 2010 is the 56% of independents, just short of his overall average of 58%, consider Obama a winner during his first year in office.

Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Poll: Public opinion in the 2000s from start to finish

READ FULL STORY HERE
With the curtain closing in the 2000s Gallup did some reflecting on the ten years that were using four separate trends to measure public opinion. Overall satisfaction with the direction of America, Presidential and Congressional job approval ratings and the most important issues of the decade were viewed in a chronological timeline.
The trend of U.S. satisfaction has been characterized overall by a steep decline in optimism as the decade of the 2000s wore on. America entered the decade widely content with itself and the direction it was headed. Nearly 70% of the public claimed to be satisfied with the direction of the country as of January 2000 according to Gallup. The first of three major declines in public optimism took place over the latter stages of 2000 and throughout most of 2001. The disputed election of President Bush and an economy suffering through a downward spiral of recession and bursting bubbles after the booming 90s saw satisfaction drop to 48% by August of 2001.

Then came the 9/11 tragedies and a blow that rattled the core of American life also helped trigger a call to unity – at least for a short while. The high point of 70% satisfaction with the direction of the United States was achieved in December of 2001. Public perception was sent downward again however as the positive effects of the 9/11 aftermath seemingly began to dissipate. By mid-2002 satisfaction was being recorded at virtually identical totals as it was a month before the tragedy a year earlier.

It has essentially been dropping ever since. Average approval fell to 46% in 2003, the year the Iraq War began splintering both the public and media. The heated election year of 2004 continued the decline now at 43%. By 2005 it had fallen to 38%. The year of 2006 was characterized by plummeting Bush approval ratings and slipping public confidence shooting the number of those satisfied down even further to 31%. By 2007 it had dipped further to 28% and by the beginning of 2008 public satisfaction, now below 20%, had reached its lowest level since 1992.

The financial crisis which began in October of 2008, a month before the election of President Obama, sent public optimism diving to the record low level of eight-percent. Obama’s inauguration and increased satisfaction with the Democratic Party surged the number upwards, peaking at 36% as of August of this year. However the eroding of public confidence reflected in the President’s fallen approval numbers and particular dissatisfaction with the issue of health care reform has settled the number back to down to 25% as we reach the end of the decade.

The most important problems facing the country as perceived by the American public have shifted over time. Lately it has been the economy that is far and away the top concern. Gallup claimed that twenty-nine different problems/issues were mentioned by at least one-percent of the public in their final poll on the topic in December of 2009. The top-four issues overall dealt with the aforementioned economy, healthcare, terrorism and wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Terrorism and war were not part of the public consciousness during the first relatively peaceful year of the decade. Not surprisingly concern over terrorism peaked in October of 2001 at 46% when it was briefly the top overall issue with Americans. By the beginning of 2003 the number of those reported it to be their top concern dropped to under 20%. There were some peaks and valleys in concern over terrorism generally triggered by periodic attacks on countries abroad reported by the news. That said by late-2006 concern over the issue had dropped back to the single-digits and as we exit the 2000s the level of anxiety had fallen to the near non-existent levels it began the decade with.

The issue of war like terrorism was not a high priority topic until the September 11th attacks. By the end of 2001 concern over the perception of imminent war in the Middle East grew to around 18%. That figure dipped somewhat over the next several months but upon the invasion of Iraq in March of 2003 concern over the issue of the war shot up to 35%. President Bush’s now rather infamous “Mission Accomplished” speech sent concern plummeting back down below ten-percent.

As American casualties mounted and the war became more costly concern then rebounded to the mid-20 percentiles where it stayed on average until peaking at 40% near the beginning of 2007. Gallup figures then suggest a steady decline in concern over war from that point through the latter stages of 2009 where it has recently received a bump (15%) upon the announcement of President Obama’s troop surge and withdraw proposals for Afghanistan.

Trends in the economy and healthcare can be linked as an issue and tend to follow the same patterns in both awareness and concern for Americans. As the most important single issue the economy has never fallen below 15% but its meteoric climb from being a distant secondary issue in mid-2007 to its current status now is rather stunning. Prior to 2008 economic concerns peaked around 9/11/01 (40%), again in early-2003 at over 50% and climbed back up over 40% a few months into 2006.

The financial meltdown on Wall Street in 2008 shot concerns through the roof. By February of this year the economic anxiety had reached a record high level of 86%. The number has actually dropped considerably since that time, down to as low as 50% two months ago before rebounding to the upper-50s as the decade comes to a close. Still it has far and away been the top concern for a majority of Americans since the early stages of 2008.

Mirroring the overall economy is the issue of healthcare that has experienced similar peaks and valleys over the decade albeit at a far lower percentile of concern. Until 2009 healthcare concern reached a peak of around 13% in the latter stages of 2004 as it became a campaign issue during that year’s Presidential election. Since the first few months of 2009 awareness and concern have skyrocketed. The peak was reached in late-August and early-September at 26% before dipping modestly to the lower-20 percentiles by decades end, comfortably situated as the second biggest concern amongst Americans.

Never before have we witnessed such climactic peaks and shallows depths in Presidential approving ratings then seen in this current decade of the 2000s. The 2000s will surely be remember mostly as the decade of President Bush who was controversially elected in late-2000 and served in office until January of 2009. Book ending the Bush Presidency however were final months and beginning stages of two Democrats; Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. Although widely acknowledged as a “lame duck” President Clinton enjoyed strong approval ratings through his final year in office. Clinton was over a 60% approval for the year of 2000 and finished with an impressive 66% rating as he left office in January of 2001 according to Gallup.

In spite of the issues surrounding the election of 2000 President George W. Bush spent much of his first year in office with approval ratings ranging in the mid-50s to low-60 percentiles. Bush cratered to 51% in early-September of 2001 but the outpouring of support following the September 11th tragedy sent his approval rating up to the stratosphere. In just two weeks Bush’s approval shot up some 39-points to a Presidential record of 90% as measured by Gallup.

There was little chance Bush was going to maintain such high ratings for longer than a short while. Still the President managed to shake off his sinking numbers over the next fifteen months reaching back up to 70% after the initially successful invasion of Iraq in March 2003. Since then a steady and at times dramatic decline in ratings hampered Bush and fellow Republicans in office. By the election of 2004 Bush was narrowly elected over Democratic Senator John Kerry by way of lifting his approval ratings back above 50% after he had dropped below that threshold for a time.

The reelection of 2004 was the last hurrah for the Bush Presidency. At the point of the Hurricane Katrina disaster in September of 2005 Bush’s approval had fallen below 40% for the first time. He rebounded slightly two other times; near the beginning of 2006 and again in the summer of that year after Gallup measurements briefly pegged his number at 32%. Bush and Republicans would struggle through the rest of 2006 and the following two years however. Although the President would leave office on a modest upswing (34%) his approval ratings would frequently drop into the twenty-percentiles during much of his final year in office.

Newly elected President Obama entered the White House with much support from the American public. Gallup measured the new President’s approval rating after his inauguration in January in the mid-60s and some polls had him even higher that that. Obama peaked at around 65% in March of this year before suffering a steady drop of approval in the ensuing months. Currently embattled by his policies regarding the economy, healthcare and the war in Afghanistan Obama has made periodic trips to the upper-40 percentiles currently resting around 50% according to Gallup for the month of December.

In much the same way Presidential approval ratings have shown historically high volatility in this decade the public’s opinion of Congress has also shifted dramatically. Gallup points out that the decade of the 2000s has seen both new highs and lows for Congressional approval ratings. Starting the decade under the full control of the Republican Party Congress ranged from a low of 40% to highs in the upper-50s. After 9/11 Congress followed President Bush’s popularity to record high levels situated at 84% two weeks after the terrorist attack. Also like Bush however the honeymoon would not last long.

Congress averaged an approval rating in the mid-50s for much of 2002 and kept that average around 50% for the bulk of 2003. The shrinking support from Americans became more evident by 2004 when the ratings for the House and Senate were essentially flat for the better part of a year, nestling in the low-40 percentiles. By the end of 2005 the ratings for Congress has plummeted to around 30% and their approval under control of the GOP would follow Bush’s descending support for all of 2006. On two separate occasions Congress approval was measured at just 20% and on the eve of the Democrats takeover in November of that year the figure was at 26%.

Some renewed optimism followed the Democrats as many new elected officials entered office in early-2007. Congress peaked in February at 37% but shot right back down in the months that followed. The all-time low rating was now achieved by a Democrat controlled Congress measuring a paltry 14% in August of 2008. Once again an election would help create a surge in approval with Congress momentarily reaching the cusp of 40% shortly after President Obama took office in early-2009. Again ratings have cratered although not down to the historically horrific numbers from the summer of 2008. Congress exits the decade with exactly one in four (25%) Americans currently approving of their job performance.

“The Decade from Hell” as Time Magazine called it. Certainly a decade of change, volatility and many twists and turns. It will be interesting to see how Americans reflect on the 2000s in the coming years. Count on Gallup and other pollsters being there to track the evidence along the way.


PHOT CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS / ALEX BRANDON

Monday, December 21, 2009

Health care reform: Polling the reasons for support, opposition and understanding of the issue

READ FULL STORY HERE

Senate Democrats are finally on the verge of passing health care reform legislation. With every Democratic, including two left-leaning independents, in favor and all forty Republicans in opposition the bill is expected to be signed into law by President Obama prior to Christmas day.

It will be interesting to see what effect the passage of the bill has on the perceptions of the American public as we keep a watchful eye on new polls emerging in the coming days. Most polls at present show considerable majorities against the current version of the bill. Recently released surveys from Rasmussen Reports and CNN/Opinion Research indicate the level of support is mired in the lower 40-percentiles with opposition reaching up to the mid and high-50s.

The Kaiser Family Foundation recently chimed in on the state of health care with a survey of over 1,200 randomly selected samples. Their elaborate charts have been tracking support and opposition on any number of issues since mid-February.

Kaiser reports 54% want health care reform immediately. That is a modest drop from 58% in November. The highest total was reported in February when 62% were in favor of immediate action on the issue. The lowest total meanwhile was measured in August at 53%. Kaiser shows slipping optimism from the public as to whether the country will be better or worse off with health care reform. Although the number who think America will be better off outnumbers those who think the country will be worse off by a margin of 45-31% that number has tumbled dramatically from a 54-27% split just last month. When asked the same question regarding their own family responders were divided by a 35-27% margin.

The Kaiser survey then broke down the 35% who claimed their families would be better off with health care reform into five separate sub-groupings. 31% believe a new bill would help control costs as the main reason for their support. 26% think they will be better able to maintain coverage for their whole family even in the event of one or both parents losing their job. 13% think reform will help their families more by allowing them to see the doctor more often and an identical percentage estimate the positive benefits to their country as a whole as the main reason. Lastly 6% of poll responders like the idea of having better choices and greater benefits.

On the flip side Kaiser looked at the 27% of those who claimed a new health care system would harm their families. The largest of four sub-groupings (47%) claimed the cost too high to afford for themselves, future generations or country at large as the primary reason for their opposition. One-third (33%) of the public claimed the passage of a new bill would negatively affect current health care plans that an individual may already be happy with as well as create additional problems with access and coverage. Similarly one in nine adults (11%) have Medicare related concerns that range from not having the same benefits from before to the fear that coverage to seniors could be cut off. The last 11% believe the government to be a bad manager for administrating health care and have a more general concern of the role of big government control.

Broken down by party over two-thirds (67%) of Democrats believe the country to be better off as a whole if health care reform is passed by the President and Congress. That figure represents a six-point drop from last month and is down from a high of 76% in April and June however. Republicans are more opposed than ever to a new plan with just 21% currently of the opinion that America will be better off down from a high of 38% in February. The steepest decline is with independents however. Falling sharply from percentages in the low to mid-50s in recent months just 38% of independents now believe the country will be better off for new health care reform.

Seniors are vastly more negative toward the possible effects of health care reform than younger adults. 52% of the over-65 crowd believes things would be worse off for themselves with a new bill against just 21% who think they’ll be better. Those younger are more optimistic about the fate of their elders regarding the changes stemming from reform. By a margin of 45-26% those under-65 think seniors will be better off with around one in five total not thinking the changes will make that much difference either way.

The public is fairly evenly divided in grading the role of the media on the issue and most Americans are tuned in to the debate. More (38%) think the news media has done a very good or excellent job in describing the different health care proposals and what they mean them and their families than those who feel they’ve done poorly (28%). 32% however think the media has done only a fair job in their coverage according to the Kaiser Family survey. Over three-quarters (76%) of the public has been following the health care discussions with 34% suggesting they’ve been following very closely. The level of attention and activism is up from the previous major health care issue in America back in February of 1994.

Despite their level of attention to the subject much of the public remains confused as to where their local representatives stand. Only 48% know what the positions their local Senators have on health care reform and just 42% know what side of the fence their district Congressional representative is sitting. Lastly there remains the possibility of considerable confusion and a lack of understand on the issue by the American people. When asked the following question regarding public option and the proposed government-administered plan to compete with private insurers 47% believe this option to be open to anyone with an additional 23% unsure. The correct answer that claimed such an option would be available only to those without employer coverage was scored accurately by just 30% of poll responders.


PHOTO CREDIT: ASSOCIATED PRESS / EVAN VUCCI