Latest findings from state polls in Pennsylvania and New Jersey

READ FULL STORY HERE

One of the more reliable pollsters in the business, Quinnipiac, today released their survey results on a host of data coming in from Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

Focusing mostly on Ed Rendell, the recently resolved budget impasse in Pennsylvania and the New Jersey Governor’s race below is a list of some of their key findings.

1) Scattered field of Democrats, Corbett still well ahead in Pa. Governor’s race

The 2010 Governor’s race in Pennsylvania is shaping up to be a competitive one on the Democratic side whereas Tom Corbett is still the heavy favorite for Republicans. Five Democratic candidates currently share 50% of the support from Pennsylvanians but a large number (46%) remain undecided. Dan Onorato is the front-runner at 14% with Joe Hoeffel and Jack Wagner trailing closely behind at 12% and 11% respectively. Only two legitimate contenders are currently on the GOP radar and Tom Corbett continues to outpace Jim Gerlach by a wide 42-13% margin. 43% remain undecided however.

2) Governor Rendell’s approval up slightly, still decidedly negative

Pennsylvanians may be relieved by the end of the state’s budget crisis but their blame of the Governor and leaders over the impasse persists. Last month Ed Rendell’s approval rating plummeted to 39% against 53% who disapproved – far and away his worst ever figures. Now at the end of September we see a slight improvement to 42-51% for the Governor. Never the less Pennsylvanians continue to give Rendell harsh grades on his handling of the state budget (26%) and the overall economy (34%). More disapprove (37%) than approve (31%) of the current budget agreement worked out by the Governor and state legislature.

3) Criticism of state legislature persists even after budget resolution

Neither Governor Rendell nor the Pennsylvania state legislature can claim momentum coming out of their recent budget agreement. Just 27% of Key Stone State voters now approve of the legislature with a record high 64% now disapproving of how they are handling their job. More blame the legislature than the Governor for the long struggle to get a budget a passed although 30% think they share equally in the blame. Republicans are being blamed more than Democrats working in the legislature (21-9%) for the current budget woes.

4) Pennsylvania’s growing slightly more dissatisfied with the way things are going

Asked how they feel things are going in their state overall a majority of Pennsylvanians polled continue to show their dissatisfaction. Just two-percent of voters are “very” satisfied with the current state of affairs in Pa. against 23% who claim to be very dissatisfied. There is almost an even number of those near the middle who are somewhat satisfied (37%) or somewhat dissatisfied (36%) with the recent happenings from their home state. This is the most negative assessment yet since Quinnipiac has been polling Pennsylvanians on the question, down from a record high of 68% of voters who were at least somewhat satisfied with events in their state from June of 2002.

5) Most Pennsylvanians relieved over passing of budget, evenly divided on spending

It seems that most Pennsylvanians are simply relieved to finally have a state budget passed, regardless of it being a potentially flawed agreement. 57% state-wide consider themselves relieved against 33% who think both sides should have kept hammering out the details regardless of how long it took to complete. In the Philadelphia area that included 68% of voters relieved. On the topic of spending a nearly identical 43% think more cuts should have been made and 44% believe that it would have been at the risk of vital state services. 58% of Republicans were in favor of cuts with 59% of Democrats agreeing to keep current spending levels. Independents were closely divided 47-42%.

6) Governor Corzine closing the gap against Christie

Although recent polls like that from

Rasmussen Reports show a mostly stable race between the two candidates Quinnipiac’s latest survey now has Governor Jon Corzine trailing by just four-points in New Jersey. Perhaps the influence of Christopher Daggett now polling at 12% has taken a toll on Republican Chris Christie. Corzine still pulls in just 39% of likely voters in the Garden State but Christie’s drop to 43% is responsible for the narrowing race. A September 1st poll showed a ten-point gap between the two major candidates and Daggett pulling in just 9% of the vote.

7) Unfavorable opinions of Chris Christie at a new high

The individual popularity of Republican challenger Chris Christie is starting to show some cracks. His favorable and unfavorable ratings are now even for the first time in the campaign at 38% - another 22% still claim not to know enough about the candidate. 14% of Republicans now hold an unfavorable view of Christie against just 11% of Democrats who view him favorably. Independent voters show a narrow favorable to unfavorable gap of 38-35%. Christie’s popularity has dropped with the results of each poll from the high of a 19% plus favorable rating in July, to 16% in August, 11% earlier this month and now dead even as we head into October.

8) No change in Governor Corzine’s anemic favorable ratings

While Chris Christie is just receiving his first batch of bad news in terms of public perception Governor Corzine has been mired with negativity for quite some time. Little to no change in this latest Quinnipiac poll from earlier in the month shows that just 34% of New Jersey voters have a favorable opinion of Governor against 56% who do not. Alarming for the Governor is the number of independents (61%) who hold an unfavorable view as opposed to those who do have a favorable opinion (29%). Just 36% of Garden State voters approve of the job Corzine is doing, a modest two-point improvement from a month ago.

9) More than twice as many dissatisfied with current state affairs in NJ than satisfied

The pessimism shared by New Jersey voters is both consistent and reaches across political boundaries. Similar to results found in each of their past two state polls Quinnipiac finds just two-percent are “very” satisfied with the way things are going in the Garden State and just 32% are at least somewhat satisfied overall. Only 4% of Democrats and one in a hundred Republicans and independents are very satisfied with the direction of their home state. Over four times as many Democrats than Republicans are at least somewhat satisfied but all three political groups are well over 30% in the number of those claiming to be at least somewhat dissatisfied.

10) President Obama’s approval ratings rebound in New Jersey

Although still down from his rather lofty July numbers when 60% of Garden State voters approved of the President’s job performance Barack Obama has rebounded some in New Jersey. Currently 56% approve of the President up from a low of 51% earlier this month. Those figures include 89% of Democrats, 23% of Republicans and a 50-44% approval to disapproval split of independent voters. Obama’s minor surge in New Jersey over the past month may have something to do with the improving performance of Governor Corzine who has hitched much of his political wagon to the President’s agenda.

Poll: Americans increasingly tuned in to political news

READ FULL STORY HERE

With the level of discussion on social topics so high and so many Americans involved in the political process in recent years it’s not surprising to see an increase in the number of those paying attention to political news.

The results of a recent Gallup survey show that far more Americans are tuned in lately than ever before. Generally Gallup has measured a considerable drop in the level of attention Americans pay to political news from an election year to a one without major Presidential or Congressional races. While there has been a predictable drop from September of 2008 to 2009 an impressive number of Americans (36%) still claim to follow national political news “very” closely at present. Last election season 43% suggested they were very closely in tune with the events of the day, a record high percentage since Gallup began its tracking on this topic in 2001.

Charting the course from when President George W. Bush was first inaugurated in 2001 interest in political news dropped to its lowest point (19%) in the months prior to the September 11th tragedies. Since that time there has been a steady increase in the number of those plugged in to their news media. By the election season of 2004 some 36% of Americans claimed to be tuned in closely and while that total dropped to around 28% in the following off-election year, 31% of Americans were back viewing attentively for the 2006 midterms.

So far we have seen a steady rise, according to Gallup’s polling, in the number of those viewing political news closely in off-election years. In late-2001 just 23% were heavily tuned in. Those figures increased to 27% in 2003, 28% in 2005, 30% by 2007 and now a record high of 36% in 2009. Just as impressive as the total number of Americans who are closely in turn with political news are the 42% who suggest they are at least "somewhat" plugged in to their coverage. This brings the current total to 78% of adults who show at least some interest in following national affairs.

Gallup actually began tracking this statistic from the mid-stages of 1995 to mid-1996 before leaving a four and half year gap in their data gathering. The lowest total in the number of those who paid attention to political news in that span was 69% registered in the early-July of 1995. The highest number was measured at 81% in January of 1996 as that year’s election season began. Currently just 6% of adults report not watching news of national political affairs at all.

By party the number of Republicans exceeds Democrats and independents in the level of those tuned in. 41% of Republicans watch political news very closely, 37% of independents do the same, while 30% of Democrats share in that assessment. There is slightly more consistency in the number of those who do not pay any attention to political news. This includes just 18% of Republicans, 21% of Democrats and 24% of independents who are essentially tuned out.

Gallup points out that overall Republicans tend to report following political news a bit closer than Democrats or independents but these numbers have been subject to change depending on the election cycle. Democrats exceeded Republican levels during the span of late-August and early-September in 2004 by a 41-38% margin. Both parties cratered to a 26% level of attentiveness during that same span of 2005 against 30% independents who viewed news more closely. By the 2006 midterms Republicans tuned in considerably more than Democrats (35-27%) in spite of their heavy losses than fall. Last year’s election cycle which recorded record highs across the board included 50% of Republicans closely following political news against 44% of Democrats and 37% of independents doing the same.

Lastly Gallup shows substantial differences in terms of gender, age, education and income regardless of party identification. More men than women are tuned in closely (42-30%). Those aged 65 and older (46%) are far more attentive than young adults 18-29 (19%), or even those aged 30-64 (36%). The higher the level of education the more politically interested people tend to be. Postgraduates are tops at 52% closely tuned in, high school grads or less the least at just half that figure (26%) and those claiming some college or college graduates fit comfortably in the middle (39%). Greater wealth also seems to equal greater political interest and awareness. Just 26% of those making less than $30,000 a year follow political news closely against 34% in the $30,000-$74,999 range and 45% who earn $75,000 or more.

Battleground Pennsylvania: A history of Presidential politics in the Keystone State

READ FULL STORY HERE

With many of the world’s leaders meeting this week in Pittsburgh for the G20 conference it has been a rather slow few days for pollsters. Perhaps that will give us time to do a quick reflection on Pennsylvania’s unique history in Presidential elections as consistently one of the key battleground states through the years.

Pennsylvania has been viewed as an essential piece to the electoral puzzle of nearly every Presidential candidate over the past several decades. Its significant electoral clout along with the competitive nature of its politics places it high upon the mantle of most sought after states. Perhaps only Florida and Ohio have garnered more attention in recent years from national political campaigns attracted to the rich diversity of voter ideologies in both the primary and general election seasons.

The Keystone State was always a significant electoral victory for any candidate but it wasn’t always a competitive one. Admitted as the second state after ratifying the Constitution in December of 1787, Pennsylvania has participated in all 56 general elections dating back to 1789. Here is a history in brief of PA’s role in Presidential politics through the years.


1789-1824: Colonial Era to Jackson & the party split

In 1789 American War hero George Washington ran unopposed and swept all ten states en route to becoming the first American President. Pennsylvania’s electoral clout was sizable in the first ever election containing ten-electoral votes, tied with Massachusetts and Virginia for most. Less than 1.3% of an estimated 2.4-million eligible/free voters cast their votes in the election. John Adams was selected as Vice President getting about half the 69-total electoral voters from a scattered field of nearly a dozen candidates who ran for the position.

Nearly four years later the immensely popular Washington again ran unopposed and his Vice President Adams was also reelected. Pennsylvania dropped to the third largest state on the electoral map with fifteen-votes but it still composed over 11% of the country now fifteen states strong. In 1796 Pennsylvanians chose Democratic-Republican Thomas Jefferson for President but found themselves on the losing end to Federalist and sitting VP John Adams. The election was a close contest with Adams securing the victory by way of a narrow 71-68 electoral vote margin.

Four years later Pennsylvania was a focal point for the first time in Presidential politics. Thomas Jefferson defeated John Adams but due to a split in the Democratic-Republican Party Aaron Burr was left with as many electoral votes (73) as the would-be President Jefferson. In the general election the Keystone State almost evenly split its fifteen electors between Jefferson and Adams but helped Jefferson eventually win the Presidency by voting for him 9-4 over Burr in a special election of state delegations.

Over the next several elections a series of landslide victories in which Pennsylvania sided with the winner reduced the state’s importance on the national scale. Still its size and clout could not be ignored as PA was twenty-electors strong in both the 1804 and 1808 elections, second most in the union. Again from 1812-1820 Pennsylvania with 25-electors had the second most in America, exceeded only by the state of New York’s 29.

In 1824 the infamous “corrupt bargain” election helped elect John Quincy Adams over the more popular Andrew Jackson. In an odd twist four members of the same party (Democratic-Republican) ran for President with Jackson finishing as the clear winner in terms of both popular and electoral votes but not securing the majority needed to take office automatically. Pennsylvania came out strong for "Old Hickory" in both the general and special House elections but Adams ultimately secured the victory.



1828-1856: Formation of modern parties & the election of James Buchanan

Angered by his controversial loss in the 1824 election Andrew Jackson helped engineer a split in the Democratic-Republican Party. By the 1828 election he would help engineer the newly formed Democrats’ rise to power over Quincy Adams and the National Republican Party. Pennsylvania cast all 28 of its electoral votes in this contest for Jackson and by 1832 a new census brought the state’s total to a new high of thirty-electors, still second most in the country.

Any Democratic tradition that might have been forming in Pennsylvania was put on hold by Whig candidate William Henry Harrison. Although his Presidency was the shortest in American history Harrison stomped incumbent President Martin Van Buren 234-60 in the electoral college winning the 1840 election. The recently formed Whig Party, now united behind a single candidate, even held their first national convention in the Pennsylvania capital of Harrisburg that year.

As the exploration of the American-west stretched population Pennsylvania dropped to 26 electoral-votes for the 1844 and '48 elections where it never the less played in important role siding with the victor in close contests each year. By the time Democrat Franklin Pierce won in an electoral landslide in 1852 the Keystone State had rebounded in size with 27-electors.

In 1856 the state of Pennsylvania placed its one and only candidate in the White House helping Democrat James Buchanan to a decisive win in an election with three prominent candidates. Buchanan actually defeated sitting President Franklin Pierce in a primary challenge to secure the party nomination. The short-lived American or “Know Nothing” Party formed from the ashes of the Whig’s also held its convention in Philadelphia that year selecting former President Millard Fillmore as its nominee.

Most historians agree that largely due to his mishandling of the slavery issue James Buchanan ranks near the top of the list of worst American Presidents. His failure to even win re-nomination in 1860, the subsequent defeat of the Democrats by Abraham Lincoln and the outbreak of the Civil War changed the course of American political history and Pennsylvania’s role in the presidency.



1860-1932: Civil War & the Republican stronghold

Tensions had been brewing throughout the 1850s on the issues of states rights and slavery. Those tensions would boil over following the election of 1860. Angered by the domestic agenda of Pennsylvanian President James Buchanan the first truly sectional major party rose to power in the form of the Republican Party. Abraham Lincoln won the Republican nomination and then against a divided field of Democrats took home the Presidency.

Fearing the policies of the new President who campaigned heavily against slavery the country split in two and the new Confederacy was formed. Pennsylvania still the second largest state in the country at this time threw its support behind Lincoln who carried the Keystone State by nearly nineteen-percentage points in the general election. Lincoln’s Presidency would be so transforming that it set the stage for a Republican north and Pennsylvania over the next several decades.

Reunited again four years later the Democratic Party would make periodic inroads in Pennsylvania although the state would not go “blue” again for another 72-years. The closest election during this period came in 1876 when Republican Rutherford B. Hayes won the Presidency by the narrowest of margins. His one-electoral vote victory offset a popular vote margin of over three-percentage points in favor of Democrat Samuel Tilden. Pennsylvania played a critical role in the outcome of this election. With its population rapidly growing during the height of the industrial revolution and its electoral clout up to 29-votes the Keystone State was the only one in the northeast region to deliver for Hayes.

Four years later native son and former Civil War General Winfield Hancock made a bid for the Presidency against Republican James Garfield. Hancock lost the popular vote by fewer than 2,000 making it the closest margin in election history. In both an odd twist and perfect example of Republican strength in Pennsylvania during that era even though Hancock hailed from the Philadelphia area he failed to capture his home state. This is particularly notable considering how close the popular vote was in the general election. Hancock lost Pennsylvania by better than four-percentage points, far more than the 0.1% with which he lost the country.

The GOP steamrolled ahead in Pennsylvania winning all but one contest by at least six-percentage points and capturing the White House in fourteen of the eighteen elections held between Lincoln’s 1860 victory and Herbert Hoover’s win in 1928. The only exception came in 1912 when a split ticket helped Democrat Woodrow Wilson secure victory over independent former Republican President Theodore Roosevelt and sitting GOP President William Howard Taft. Excluding that election oddity the Republican Party candidate won by an average of 17.5% in Pennsylvania between 1860-1932.



1936-1988: Battleground Pennsylvania
With the United States plunged deep into an economic depression the era of Republican dominance came to a swift end with the landslide victory of Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932. Although Pennsylvania had been carried in that election by sitting President Herbert Hoover his margin of just 5.5% signaled a philosophical change was on the horizon.

Roosevelt’s historic landslide victory of 1936 included a sixteen-point victory in the Keystone and while his margins of victory both in PA and nationally were less impressive in the years that followed he still carried the state in 1940 and '44. In addition to Roosevelt’s economic agenda and World War II leadership the change in Pennsylvania voting patterns came from working class Americans and minorities – in no short supply in the industrial north – who were siding heavily with Democratic policies.

In spite of this Pennsylvania’s Republican tradition remained in tact and would continue to be reckoned with in the years that followed. Moderate Republican Thomas Dewey carried Pennsylvania in 1948 despite his upset loss to Democrat Harry Truman on a national scale. Both parties also held their conventions in Philadelphia that year. Dwight Eisenhower who beat Democrat Adlai Stevenson twice in the 1950s by decisive margins also carried the Keystone State with little resistance. Interestingly Eisenhower while not a native born Pennsylvania did move his residence to Gettysburg PA during his first term and could be considered the state’s second ever President after James Buchanan.

As population patterns shifted nationally Pennsylvania’s electoral clout which had peaked in the election years between 1912-28 (38-electoral votes) would begin a steady decline that continues to this day. Pennsylvania continued to play a critical role in the outcome of several elections however. 1960 was the closest Presidential election of the 20th century with a popular vote margin of around 0.1% and no less than nineteen states carried by less than three-percentage points.

Democrat John F. Kennedy was aided heavily by his modest victory in the Keystone State defeating Richard Nixon and collecting its 32-electoral votes. Four years later Lyndon Johnson set a Democratic record in Pennsylvania crushing Barry Goldwater by better than thirty-points in his landslide victory. Nixon’s narrow popular vote win in 1968 over Democratic Hubert Humphrey belied his loss in Pennsylvania by 3.6% but four years later he took home PA by twenty-points en route to a landslide of historic proportions.

Pennsylvania continued to stay relatively in line with the general national tide in the years that followed. Democratic Jimmy Carter won the 1976 election by a little more than two-percentage points while winning the battleground state of Pennsylvania by 2.7%. From 1980-88 Republican's Ronald Reagan and George Bush also scored victories in the Keystone State although their large wins nationally lessened the importance of their success in Pennsylvania.



1992-Present: The left-leaning Pennsylvania

Although Republican Presidents were ultimately successful in Pennsylvania throughout the 1980s there were signs that the state was inching further to the political left. Ronald Reagan won the 1984 election over Walter Mondale by nineteen-percentage points by only carried Pennsylvania by 7.4%. Pre-election polls from 1988 correctly suggested that Pennsylvania would be a key battleground state in a year where Democrats were hopeful. Republican George H.W. Bush carried most of surrounding Philadelphia and ultimately the Key Stone State’s 25-electoral votes. Still his victory of just 2.3% was noticeably lower than 7.8% margin he collected nationally.

The tide turned convincingly in 1992 with the arrival of Arkansas Democrat Bill Clinton on the scene. That year’s election was unique also because of the third-part presence of billionaire Ross Perot posing a challenge both to Clinton and sitting President George H.W. Bush. Perot would become the most successful third-party candidate – in terms of the popular vote total – since Teddy Roosevelt. He took home nearly nineteen-percent nationally while winning better than eighteen-percent in Pennsylvania.

The impact of Pennsylvania’s clout electorally speaking had diminished somewhat by 1992. With much of the America's population gains shifting south and westward the Keystone State dropped to being the fifth largest state with 23-electoral votes after the 1990 census. Still it would be something of a bellwether for Clinton and the Democrats who won PA by better than nine-percentage points in both 1992 and 1996. The easy Clinton victories of the 90s also served as a realigning election to an extent. The northeast once a bastion of Republican support had now almost fully changed sides and in certain instances have done so by wide-margins.

Pennsylvania’s role in Presidential politics was become more and more crucial in spite of its shrinking size on the electoral map. In this current decade the Keystone State has been visited and campaigned in innumerable times both by Democrats and Republicans positioning it as one of the three key battleground states along with Florida and Ohio. This was never more apparent than in the 2000 election one of the closest battles in Presidential history. George W. Bush accepted the GOP nomination at the Republican Convention in Philadelphia that year but it was Democrat Al Gore that captured the state’s 23-electoral votes by a little better than four-percentage points.

Bush ended up as the winner in the highly disputed election where Florida took center state. Four years later as President Bush ran for reelection Pennsylvania was again focused upon as one of the critical swing-states that would eventually decide the race. Pre-election polls conducted on the eve of the November 2nd election showed Pennsylvania at a near deadlock. Survey USA had a John Kerry lead of one-point, Quinnipiac showed a deadlocked tie and Gallup had Bush with a four-point lead. In the end Democrat John Kerry won the Keystone State by 2.5% but lost by around that same marginally nationally to Bush who captured the two other major battleground states of Florida and Ohio.

The recent 2008 election ushered in Democrat Barack Obama as the decisive winner both nationally and in Pennsylvania. Republican nominee John McCain took interest never the less in Pennsylvania’s crucial 21-electoral votes. After all Hillary Clinton had defeated Obama soundly in that year’s primary contest appealing more towards older, white and working class voters that lived in the central, northern and suburban regions of the state.

Polls conducted just days before the general election however showed the strength of Obama and the Democrats in PA hard to ignore. On Election Day November 4th Barack Obama took home a resounding victory in Pennsylvania by 10.3% while winning the election with 365-electoral votes. It was the best performance for a Democrat in Pennsylvania since Lyndon Johnson’s thirty-point win there in 1964 and further established the left-leaning reputation Pennsylvania currently holds. Due to the potent mixture of its size, political diversity and regional significance Pennsylvania will no doubt continue to play a significant role in Presidential politics and the outcome of elections for decades to come.

Poll: Corzine still trails Christie in New Jersey Governor's race

READ FULL STORY HERE

With less than a month and a half remaining in the New Jersey Governor’s race incumbent Jon Corzine simply isn’t picking up ground quickly enough on Republican challenger Chris Christie.

Residents of the greater Philadelphia area as well as national pundits continue to follow this race closely. It has been suggested that an off-election year race for Governor serves as something of a barometer to what sort of political tide we can expect to see in 2010 and beyond. If that is indeed the case the Democrats might want to rethink their game plan, for a Republican has not won a statewide election in New Jersey since 1997 and according to the latest Rasmussen poll the Democratic Governor trails 48-41%.

This figure actually represents a slight, if statistically insignificant improvement for Corzine from a previous Rasmussen’s poll released earlier this month showed him trailing his Republican challenger by eight percentage-points. Independent Chris Daggett who recently placed a humorous TV ad lampooning both major-party candidates never the less is struggling to make his mark in the race, attracting just 6% of the vote.

For Christie the 48% of support he is receiving from Garden State voters means of course that he is still under the 50% threshold and not exactly running away with the race. Christie’s popularity peaked a month ago when Rasmussen indicated that the former U.S. Attorney and prosecutor led 50-42%. More recently a poll pegged him at just 46% of the vote but more importantly his lead of seven or eight points over that span has remained in tact.

Governor Corzine meanwhile can’t seem to budge the overall negative perceptions New Jersey residents have of him in spite of a barrage of television spots over the past several weeks. Just 38% of voters in the Garden State approve of his job performance against 61% who do not. Almost identical to that and also critically low for an incumbent at this point in a campaign season is his personal favorability mired at a 39-60% positive to negative split. Not that Christie is wildly popular either as his 48-46% favorable to unfavorable margin attests. But more than anything this election is being played up as a referendum on the policies of incumbent Governor Corzine.

New Jersey is a left-leaning state and as Rasmussen points out Democrats traditionally close strong even with their poll numbers lagging late in races. The presence of independent Chris Daggett, while not a threat to win never the less presents a problem for Corzine however. Eight-percent of Democrats plan to cast their vote for Daggett against just 2% of Republicans who suggest they are defecting. If Corzine was simply able to close that margin of six-points between the third-party support being offered by Democrats and Republicans this race would be a virtual dead-heat.

As it stands we will continue to watch this race as it heads into the back stretch. No lack of fanfare should be expected regardless of the result. If Christie wins it will be viewed by Republicans as a comeback for the party and an important step in their quest to take back power in 2010 – or at least close the gap considerably. On the flip side if Corzine pulls off what now has to be labeled an upset it will too be viewed, this time by Democrats, as a comeback and important step in stabilizing the current balance of power.

Poll: Approval of health care reform varies by state, concerns linger nationwide

READ FULL STORY HERE

This morning Rasmussen Reports released in video form the results of yet another health care poll. Unlike others however this one takes a look at the approval, or lack thereof, for President Obama and Congressional Democrats reform proposals.

Ten states were weeded out and looked at specifically. There was a healthy range of some of more liberal spots in the country (Massachusetts, Connecticut), left-leaners (New Jersey, Minnesota) conservative bastions (Texas), right-leaners (Virginia, North Carolina) and a few battleground states in between (Colorado, New Hampshire, Nevada). The results continue to illustrate the struggles that favorable politicians and reform backers have in convincing the general public of the need of this current version of health care reform.

Rasmussen’s nationwide tracking of the health care issue indicates that over the past ten days of polling (9/8 – 9/18) a combined average of 45.6% Americans approve and 51.4% disapprove of the Democratic administration’s reform plan. These overall numbers are to an extent reflected by the tracking of responses from those citizens residing in the aforementioned states.

Strongest in favor of the new health care plan are not surprisingly the two most Democratic supporting states on our list of ten. Massachusetts sides with the reform proposal by a margin of 52-44% and Connecticut voters are supportive to the tune of 52-46%. President Obama in the 2008 election carried both New England states by margins of 26% and 23% respectively. Next on the list in terms of favorability is New Jersey splitting its voters by a 50-47% margin. The Garden State is one of the precious few where a majority or near majority of voters are in favor of the Democratic health care plan, it’s also one embroiled in a testy Governor’s race. Not surprisingly with the modest approval for reform expressed by New Jersey’s voters incumbent Governor and Democrat Jon Corzine has run ads and campaigned in favor of President Obama’s health care plan.

Two other states on the list, Colorado and Minnesota also show a plurality of voters who favor the current health care reform plan. President Obama and the Democrats face a tougher challenge in the swing-state of New Hampshire however where voters are against the plan 50-47%. Also against by solid percentages are three key states where the Democratic Party made major gains in the last election. Virginia is opposed by a 51-46% margin, Nevada disapproves to the tune of 52-45% and 53% of North Carolina voters are against current reform legislation against just 44% who would like to see it passed.

The reddest of states on Rasmussen’s featured list of ten, Texas, is overwhelmingly against the push for reform brought forth by the President and Democratically controlled Congress. By a margin of 58-40% Texans say “no”. This was of course a state that voted against Obama by nearly ten percentage-points in the last election but also one that echoes many of the fears being expressed by Americans nationwide.

Three subsets of questions asked to New Jersey, Connecticut and Texas voters go into greater detail regarding the negative perceptions of reform. 500 likely voters in New Jersey expressed concern with the overall quality of coverage. In this poll only 29% feel that health care will improve under the new plan against 45% who think it will get worse. Two in ten Garden State voters assume things will stay about the same as they are currently. In Texas the economic impact of new health care legislation is viewed harshly. Only 9% of a thousand polled in the Lone State State are confident the federal deficit will be reduced by reform against 68% who think it will increase the deficit and 15% who say it will have no impact.

Even in left-leaning Connecticut where a majority of voters approve of reform legislation many are still pessimistic of its cost benefits. 43% expect the price of health care coverage to go up against just 24% who expect to see a decrease. Another 26% figure it to stay about the same and 7% remain uncertain.

With approval ratings for Congress at near record-low, which party holds edge?

READ FULL STORY HERE
With so much talk recently about President Obama’s struggling approval numbers both on the issue of health care an overall it would be easy to assume the Republican Party is on the cusp of a comeback. Sure enough there are several individual races in the upcoming 2010 midterms where high profile Democrats look in danger of being unseated at this point in time.

The bigger picture however remains that while the party in power always gets the most attention the vast majority of Americans are dissatisfied with their leaders on either side of the political isle.

A recently released Gallup/USA Today survey shows that both Congressional Democrats and Republicans are at near record-low approval numbers. Aside from a spike in confidence for both sides following the January inauguration of President Obama the overall trend for either party is a downward slide since early-2002. Currently the Gallup poll pegs Democratic approval in congress at 36% with the GOP pulling in an even more dismal 27%. Democrats reached their all-time low at the end of 2007 when just 30% of Americans approved of how they were handling their job, the Republican Party meanwhile cratered at 25% just before the beginning of 2009.

Republican voters are quick to call out what they perceive to be a lackluster performance by their own party. Just 39% of Republicans now approve of the performance of their GOP representatives, this down from 52% nine months ago. Oddly enough Democrats actually have an improved opinion of the GOP congress giving them a 20% approval, up eleven percentage-points from last December.

Perhaps the influence of Democratic President in the White House has given Democratic voters a more optimistic view of their politicians overall. They give their own party’s Congress a 67% approval rating currently, up seven-points from December. Independent’s meanwhile favor Democrats in congress by a narrow 28-25% margin down from 29-22% nine months ago. The highest marks ever scored for either party within their own party not surprisingly came in the wake of September 11, 2001. Democratic approval of the Dems in Congress climbed to 82% in the later stages of 2001 and Republicans view of the GOP surged up to 86% in early-2002. Similarly independent support of both parties reached a record high in early-2002 with 55% approving of the job Democrats in Congress were doing and 52% giving positive marks to Republican representatives.

Gallup isn’t alone in their harsh assessment of Congress coming from voters. A recent Fox poll indicates that just 27% of registered voters approve of the job Congress is doing, down from 30% a month ago and down four-points from mid-May. AP-GFK rates Congressional approval at just 28% while CBS has the figure even lower at 26%. Poor as that sounds the approval numbers being generated by Congress from the aforementioned pollsters actually mark a considerable approvement from the truly dismal figures collected from last October.

So where do the two parties stand in terms of a head-to-head match up looming in 2010? With the individual approval ratings of either party so low Rasmussen not surprisingly has a tight race depicted. Currently the Republican Party holds a slight 41-40% edge against Democrats in a generic ballot, this mirrors the overall picture over the past several months.

Of course the midterms are over a year away and much can happen in that time to shift the political landscape. The number of Americans approving of either party’s Congress in recent years has remained consistently low however. Does this perhaps point to a fight for control of the House and Senate in the years to follow as being a battle of individual races instead of that of an overall wave of public sentiment? Only time will tell.

Poll: Support for health care reform retreats to pre-speech levels

READ FULL STORY HERE

Bounces and bubbles are two of the more common terms used by pollsters in American politics. Lately they have been used to describe the post-speech increase in the number of voters who had begun siding with President Obama’s proposals to overhaul health care.

While there has been some good news for the administration since the President’s major address before Congress last week according to at least two new polls it would appear the bouncing ball of confidence is resettling and the bubble is bursting.

The latest dose of bad medicine for Obama and supporters of health care reform comes from surveys conducted by Rasmussen and USA Today/Gallup. Last Thursday Rasmussen reported that 44% of voters were in favor of the President’s health care plan. Seven days later those numbers are back to being identical to the aforementioned total. This after an early-week post-speech bounce that saw them climb to a 51-46% approval to disapproval.

CNN/Opinion Research closely mirrored the previous findings from Rasmussen and other polling outlets. Their figures also indicated a rise to 51% support for Obama’s plan after it had been at only 44% prior to the President’s speech. New CNN numbers are likely to arrive in the coming days. For now USA Today offers up its own batch of damaging numbers for the administration and its mission to win over the hearts and minds of the American public.

When asked whether they would advise their member of congress to vote for or against a health care this year 38% were in favor of a yay vote, 40% were against and 22% had no opinion. The 22% of those without a strong opinion from the 1,030 adults polled broke fairly even (50-47%) for and against their representative voting on a bill. Other figures indicate that while a small plurality of adults think health care coverage in America will improve with the passing of a bill only 34% think the costs will improve and just 30% believe the overall quality will get better against 41% who think it will get worse.

Even worse is the confidence those have in Obama’s pledge not to raise taxes on middle income families to help pay for his reform proposals. 60% of Americans do not believe such goals can be accomplished without raising taxes against just 38% who are confident.

Reflecting back on the Rasmussen survey the figures suggest a remarkably stable position coming from the American public. Even as the issue continues to dominate headlines and with education on the topic surely increases as well the number of those opposed to the President’s plan (53%) has been relatively stable since mid-July. Scott Rasmussen points out in the Wall Street journal that while many Americans see the logic in reform for the system as a whole 68% of them rate their own coverage as good or excellent. Why tinker with a system you are happy with, especially if you fear that you have more to lose than to gain?

One thing Americans do seem more confident about is the political muscle of President Obama and Democrats to pass reform before the end of the year. Half think passage is at least somewhat likely but a far smaller percentage of the public (27%) believes that the quality of care will actually improve in the event of a new bill. That total is fairly consistent with the quarter of Americans who strongly support the President's plan.

While any number of news stories report that Democrats and Republicans are far from uniting on a compromise, the new numbers also show support for reform from the American public retreating to pre-speech numbers. Furthermore with around three-quarters of the American public somewhat against, strongly opposed or remaining uncertain of health care reform the path to success in all aspects of the issue remains a treacherous one traveled for the President.

Poll: Americans divided but Doctors united on health care reform?

READ FULL STORY HERE

Americans might be far from united in their views regarding health care reform but at least the medical community seems to be forming a consensus.

The recent results of a New England Journal of Medicine poll of 2,130 doctors as first reported by Reuters finds that 63% are in favor of both public and private health care options. Just 27% said they wanted private options only with one in ten doctors favoring public options exclusively.

A majority of doctors (55%) also would like to see the Medicare age dropped a decade to cover those over the age of 55 according to the poll. Smaller surveys found that 73% of doctors said they ought to care for the uninsured and underinsured. 67% suggested they were willing to accept limits on payments for expensive drugs and procedures as a way to save money and make basic care available to more people.

The top-line results closely mirror those found from an April study of over 5,100 physicians conducted by the American Medical Association. In that poll physicians were broken down into four separate groups; primary care providers, medical specialists or sub-specialists, surgeons or surgical specialists, and all others. The figures were fairly consistent across the board. Medical specialists were most in favor of both private and public options to the tune of 62.4%. Surgeons were the least in favor grouping of physicians but still favored the dual program by 55.6%. Overall 58.3% of physicians favored both private and public option against just 23% who were opposed.

Perhaps as a result of his recent live speech to Congress recent polls have shown a slight up tick in the number of Americans favoring President Obama’s plans to reform health care as well as approving of his handling of the issue overall. Recently released a CNN/Opinion Research poll shows the President back over the 50-percentile threshold in the number of those approving of his handling of health care policy. This is up seven-points from their prior poll conducted before his live speech. Rasmussen also showed a post-speech bounce in the number of Americans supporting Obama’s proposals although recent evidence suggests that things may have settled back down to his pre-speech numbers mired in the mid-40 percentiles.

The President’s plan to overhaul the $2.5 trillion industry to help cover many of the 46-million Americans without health coverage continues to rage on as a hot social topic. Many are against the specifics of the plan whereas others deride it for the increased government control it employs and massive debt it would likely leave. Even with the American Medical Association’s opposition to public option a significant number of its 250,000 represented physicians and doctors at large are never the less well in favor of a public and private option.

Poll: Gov. Corzine still trails in New Jersey, but by how much?

READ FULL STORY HERE

Depending on what poll you are looking at the highly conspicuous New Jersey race for Governor may either be tightening, widening or staying about the same. As we head into mid-September a couple of recent polls shed some light on the current state of affairs in this Garden State showdown.

Two surveys from Quinnipiac and Rasmussen describe a race from differing perspectives using similar numbers. The Quinnipiac poll for starters now has Republican challenger Chris Christie ahead of New Jersey Governor John Corzine 47-37% with independent Christopher Daggett pulling in nine-percent of likely voters. This points to the possibility of a failed attack ad campaign from the Governor and a widening race overall. Last month Christie’s lead over Corzine was pitted at a more modest six-point gap, 46-40%.

Rasmussen meanwhile has the spread at eight-percentage points with the challenger leading 46-38%, 6% for Daggett and one in ten New Jersey voters remaining undecided. As the race heads toward the home stretch it seems that voters are growing less certain of either candidate. Christie’s eight-point lead in the Rasmussen poll remains steady from a month ago, but both candidates have shown a drop of four-percentages points from a 50-42% race in August. Furthermore Rasmussen points to a gap that may in fact be closing in favor of Governor Corzine. When “leaners” are added to the mix Chris Christie’s lead is down to just four-points.

At 42% the Republican challenger has seen a six-point drop in the number of those with a favorable view of him. Governor Corzine meanwhile has jumped nearly ten-percentage points over the past month to a 45% favorable rating. Corzine’s unfavorables however remain considerably higher.

Moving our attention back to the Quinnipiac survey we see that while Governor Corzine does have improving numbers amongst Democratic voters the 74-15% split he has with his own party is far worse than the 86-8% support Christie receives from Republicans. While there is still the possibly for Corzine to cultivate grater support within his party it seems clear the independent vote is where he is losing this race. Christie’s lead amongst such voters is 46-30% over the Governor with 16% going to Daggett in a possible role of spoiler.

The launching of attack ads from Corzine-camp has proven to be relatively ineffective, just as Christie’s criticisms of the Governor have failed to gain much traction. A plurality of voters (49-43%) finds it unfair that Corzine attacks Christie for his loan to a former associate in the U.S. Attorney’s office. By a margin of 47-45% most feel unmerited criticism of Governor Corzine’s relationship with a former labor leader. There is an even 47-47% split meanwhile of those considering Christie’s attacks on the Governor’s failure to guard against New Jersey’s economic collapse to be warranted.

"Just about everyone has seen Gov. Jon Corzine's TV ads knocking Christopher Christie's ties to the Bush team, but most question whether it's a legitimate issue. “Unfair” they say…The Democratic attacks about Christie's loan to his former co-worker score a little higher. Christie gets a split on his ads criticizing Corzine for failing to protect New Jersey against the economic downturn." -- Maurice Carroll / Quinnipiac University Polling Institute Director

What is interesting when reviewing the figures released by both of these surveys is how they differ on topic of each candidate’s approval rating. The Rasmussen poll shows Governor Corzine with a 40% approval rating amongst New Jersey voters but Quinnipiac has his number considerably lower at 34%. The numbers for Christie meanwhile are nearly identical between the two polls but Rasmussen shows a decline in support for the Republican whereas Quinnipiac

No Republican has won a statewide race in New Jersey since 1997. The political climate in the Garden State favors a possible GOP takeover in 2010, but if in fact the numbers for Corzine closely mirror those found in the Rassmussen survey the possibility of a tight race heading into the homestretch could be likely. That said, with the incumbent Governor in all likelihood trailing and short on time to catch up the next batch of October polling could reveal the eventual winner in New Jersey.

Poll: Obama's speech earns positive reviews, mostly from Democrats

READ STORY HERE

President Barack Obama’s speech calling for an end to partisan squabbling over the issue of health care reform generates positive reviews in a just released poll from CNN. These were the results from a survey of 427 adults who watched the speech last evening and shared their thoughts on Obama’s performance.

The top line results indicate that 56% of the viewers had a “very” positive reaction to the President’s speech and 77% gave at least a somewhat positive response. Only 21% indicated a reaction that was either somewhat or very negative. These findings have to be welcomed by President Obama and reform minded Democrats currently slipping in the health care debate according to most recent polls. Three recent surveys from CNN, AP-GFK and Rasmussen show the number of Americans disapproving of the way the President is handling the health care issue to be between 52-53%.

One noticeable quirk regarding the CNN poll of the President’s speech from last evening is the number of responses from each political party. According to the survey only 18% of viewers identified themselves as Republicans. 45% identified as Democrats with a large 37% claiming to be political independents. The huge disparity between Democrats and Republicans polled no doubt played a large role in the overwhelmingly positive numbers for Obama. Still after watching last night’s speech there is a clear increase in the confidence viewers have in the President and his policies regarding health care.

Thirteen percent more viewers are now in favor of the President’s plan to reform health care after watching his speech. There was also a ten-point jump from pre to post-speech in the number of those agreeing that Obama’s policies will move the country in the right direction.

Unfortunately the CNN survey does not show the exact numbers broken down by political party. With Republicans making up only 18% of viewers in this poll numbers tell us that only about 77 of them were sampled amongst the 427 total. Such a small sample from the GOP is hardly a representative figure. More importantly we don’t know exactly what those 77 Republicans felt about the speech although we can surmise that the 21% of negative responses come largely from the GOP camp.

Democrats making up 45% of the viewers questioned surely played an overwhelming role in the high numbers Obama generated from his speech. It would have been particularly interesting to see how independents, making up 37% of those polled, rated the affair. If for instance every Democrat gave Obama either a somewhat or very positive grade on the speech and every Republican gave him negative marks, we could speculate that over 90% of independents were won over by Obama last night. This of course seems unlikely so the true impact of the President’s speech remains a mystery at this moment.

Regardless of the poor sampling from this poll it seems obvious that a clear majority of Americans were impressed by President Obama’s words last evening. Whether his words fully reassured supporters or shifted the opinion of any doubters will likely not be revealed for many more days however. Stayed tuned.

Labor Day Poll: Labor unions are losing public support

READ STORY HERE

Summer's unofficial end has come to pass with the conslusion of the holiday weekend. Very much on the mind of Americans this Labor Day is the role that labor unions play in our economy, particularly during these struggling times. The public perception of unions according to two new polls has turned increasing sour over the past year.

With the national unemployment at nearly 9.7% and at its highest level since the early-80s labor unions are no doubt shouldering much of the criticism in the eyes of many Americans, particularly the millions of those out of work. Gallup and Rasmussen both released the results of some polling concluded just in time for the holiday.

In a sharp decline from recent years fewer than half of Americans (48%) now approve of the role labor unions play in our society. While 66% of Americans still consider unions beneficial to their own members, the 48% figure collected by Gallup marks a staggering drop of eleven percentage-points from a year ago and down from 65% in 2004. The struggling economy no doubt takes a toll on public perception. The last time Gallup indicated an approval rating for labor unions anywhere near 50% was in 1979 and ’81 when the total dropped to 55% in the midst of another economic downturn.

Gallup has been tracking public opinion on labor unions since around the time of the National Labor Relations Act passed in 1936. The following year the poll found that 72% of citizens approved of the role of labor unions. That number ballooned to an all-time high from 1954-57 when three quarters of the American public had a positive view of union labor. Starting in the late-60s the number of those approving began to shrink, this in conjunction with a slowing economy and stronger Republican influence on politics from the end of the 60s through the early-90s. With the economy soaring in the late-90s however approval spiked again to 66%.

A substantial number of Americans blame labor unions for the struggling auto industry according to Gallup. Those not in favor of the industry bailouts had their negative views exacerbated, and a growing number of Americans see labor unions hurting the companies they are employed with. In terms of their impact on the overall U.S. economy a record high 51% think labor unions are hurting the situation against 39% who think they are mostly helping.

Numbers such as these are reflected in latest Rasmussen survey on the topic. With just 13% considering Labor Day to be one of America’s most important holidays the total of those who feel labor unions make our country weaker is at 45%. Only 26% suggest that unions have made our country stronger with nearly half of poll responders (48%) of the opinion that these unions have outlasted their usefulness. The perceptions Americans have of their fellow workers are also increasingly negative. 36% say Americans do not work as hard as people in other countries against just 30% who think we work harder.

A plurality of Americans (49%) still favor the existence of labor unions but the gap is noticeable between genders and political party affiliation. Rasmussen contends that 58% of men against just 33% of women have negative views toward union labor, considering it to have made our country weaker. Not surprisingly given their longtime affiliation with labor unions Democrats have a largely positive view (64%) with six in ten Republicans viewing unions unfavorably.

While not as staggering a drop as indicated by the accompanying Gallup poll Rasmussen figures show a six-percent decline in union favorability from a year ago.

Poll: Pennsylvanians surveyed on range of issues

Just as they did two months ago the Franklin & Marshall survey provides a helpful guide to the latest social and political trends that help shape the opinions of Pennsylvanian voters. The latest results that can be viewed here in full track the progress of several important and interesting topics while tracking shifts in public opinion since June. Below is a list of some of the poll highlights and key findings from this most recent release.

1) Pennsylvanians hold increasingly negative views on direction of state

The current economy and state budget impasse has no doubt taken a toll on the perceptions of Pennsylvanians since June. Only 33% of residents now think the Keystone is headed in the right direction. This marks a staggering eleven-point drop from June and is the worst total since March of 2004. Correspondingly there has been an 11% jump in the number of Pennsylvanians who think their state is off on the wrong the track. At 59% this is the highest number ever recorded by the Franklin & MarshallI survey dating back to the spring of 1995.

2) Majority of Pennsylvanians the same financially as a year ago, but many more worse off than better off

Showing an increase from June but closely mirroring the results from a March poll 52% if Pennsylvanian adults say their family’s financial situation is about the same from this time a year ago. 39% however say they are worse off against just 9% who claim to be better off. The 9% figure in particular is the lowest total ever recorded by this survey. Yet many Pennsylvanians still hold a positive views of their family fortunes looking ahead a year from now. 31% expect to be better off against just 19% who think they’ll be worse off. Nearly half (47%) expect their financial situation to remain about the same.

3) Amid budget crisis, Governor Rendell’s approval rating drops to new low

For the first time since being elected Ed Rendell has seen his favorable ratings slip to the point where more Pennsylvanians now disapprove than approve of the Governor. That might be putting it nicely. Rendell’s favorables have dropped ten-points to 32% in two months and his unfavorable rating at 53% means there is now a huge gap of twenty-one percentage points separating the positive from negative. In June the Pennsylvania Governor still have a 42-40% positive split in favorability according to the Franklin & Marshall survey.

4) Many blame State Legislature for budget woes, lack trust and confidence in body overall

While Governor Rendell has been hit hard by Pennsylvania’s budget crisis he is hardly alone in shouldering the blame from voters. When asked who is more to blame for a budget not having been passed on time 31% blame the Governor but 54% accuse the State Legislature of dragging their collective feet. Pennsylvanians do have more trust in the Legislature than the Governor (48-36%) in handling the budget, but their favorable ratings are even lower than that of Rendell overall. When asked what kind of job the Legislature is doing 58% suggested only a fair performance, more (20%) suggested they were doing a poor job than good (18%). Zero percent meanwhile said they were doing an “excellent” job.

5) President Obama still viewed favorably in Pennsylvania but his negatives are climbing

Barack Obama won Pennsylvania by ten and a half percentage points in the last election and while his in-state approval in the mid-50s remains steady over the past six months the number of those with an unfavorable view of the President is also climbing. With an increase of ten percentage points since June and sixteen from a March survey 37% of Pennsylvanians now view Obama unfavorably. The number of those undecided is down to 7% and the President's net approval stands at eighteen-points in the Keystone State.

6) Specter still having problems in Pennsylvania but he’s ahead of Toomey, Sestak

Arlen Specter pushes ahead with his bid to retain a Senate seat this fall. From party switches to hostile town-hall meetings its been a quite a year so far for the veteran politician. Specter is still fighting an uphill battle in the war of perception with Pennsylvania voters. His favorable to unfavorable ratings are at 35-42%, virtually unchanged from two months ago. Specter is still the odds on favorite to best Joe Sestak in this year’s primary leading him by 26% although 46% remain undecided. The Senator is also doing fairly well in hypothetical match ups against Republican nominee Pat Toomey. Currently Specter’s lead is 37-29% with 25% undecided, an improvement from June.

7) Pennsylvanians still have lukewarm attitudes towards health care reform

51% of Pennsylvanians are opposed to the health care proposals being discussed by congress against just 34% in favor. This is a wider gap that what we have seen coming from national figures and points to an increasingly difficult sell for Obama and Democrats in what is a key battleground state. 57% of adults also suggest that the concerns expressed by those in opposition of healthcare reform at town hall meetings represent their feelings at least in part. A majority of Pennsylvanians (57%) also do not think President Obama can reform our country’s health care system and a plurality (48%) do not think reform will improve the country’s economic situation in the long run.

8) Most Pennsylvanian’s show displeasure with the quality of their government

Just over a quarter (27%) of Pennsylvanians are satisfied with the quality of their state government, and virtually no one (1%) thinks their politicians are doing an excellent job overall. 18% of Keystone State adults think their leaders are doing a poor job with a majority (54%) giving them only fair marks in Pennsylvania. Not surprisingly most want to see members of the state House or representatives not reelected in the next election. While the 52-29% gap is a large one a similarly large disparity persists when asking individuals if they would like to see their own state representative reelected. 46% seem happy with their local politicians against 29% who do not.

9) More Democrats than Republicans in Pennsylvania but conservatives widen lead over self-described liberals

Pennsylvania registration figures show considerably more Democrats than Republicans but in terms of ideology and self-identification the gap is shrinking. The latest Franklin & Marshall poll shows a 47-41-8% breakdown of Democrats versus Republicans and independents. August was a good month for conservatives meanwhile. The 43% figure represents the highest total of conservatives in Pennsylvania since at least 1999 when the topic was first polled. Liberals on the other hand shrunk to 16% tied for their second worst showing of the decade. In the last five years liberals have averaged 18.3% to 35.3% for conservatives and 41.2% for moderates.

10) Pennsylvanians views on abortion and religion remain relatively consistent

The percentage of Pennsylvanians who believe abortion should be legal under certain or all circumstances remains consistent from recent surveys. Three-quarters (75%) share this view with a slight bump in the number of those wanting it legal under any circumstance (21% from 18%) and a minor decrease in those who want it legal in certain instances (54% from 58%). The latest survey also shows a small bump from 25% to 32% in the number of those taken the Bible’s scriptures literally but an eight-point decrease in the number who treat it more as an allegory. The number of those who consider the book a collection of fables, legends and moral precepts remains steady from June at 17%.

Poll: Yankees are World Series favorites, Patriots or Steelers to win Super Bowl

For certain sports fans September is the most wonderful time of the year.

This weekend the college football season begins, followed quickly by the start of the 2009 NFL campaign. For baseball fans September also marks the stretch run where pennant races heat up and great divisional match ups are plentiful. Rasmussen Reports recently conducted some annual surveys on pro-football and baseball as we move closer to the fall.

Heading into the last month of the regular season the New York Yankees have eclipsed the Boston Red Sox as the team most baseball fans interview in this poll of 1,797 responders think will win the World Series. This represents a large shift from mid-July when the Bo Sox were the choice of 20% of MLB fans against just 11% for the Bronx Bombers. Now the two arch rivals are shown to have swapped positions. 25% of responders pick the Yankees to win the Fall Classic and confidence in Boston’s chances has dropped to 10%.

The Red Sox are in a distant second place three-way tie with the Philadelphia Phillies and St. Louis Cardinals. The Phillies good play of late and addition of starter Cliff Lee has no doubt bolstered their chances in the court of public opinion as their percentage has increased two-points to 10% since mid-July. That’s also three percentage points better than the results gathered in a July Harris poll. Like Philadelphia the Cardinals enjoy a comfortable lead in their division and have been the National League’s hottest team over the past month. The Red Sox meanwhile linger 6.5 games behind a Yankees team who has posted baseball’s best record at 84-48. The Los Angeles Dodgers who have struggled since the All Star break have dropped to 9% in the poll.

In terms of confidence in their favorite team the Yankees also have baseball’s most optimistic fan base. 71% of Yankee fans think their team will win the World Series. Perhaps oddly 68% of Detroit Tigers fans, second most of any team, think their team will win it all in October. Only 4% of baseball fans league wide have confidence in the Tigers who never the less lead the mediocre American League Central division by 3.5 games. Majorities of Red Sox (58%) and Phillies fans (51%) have confidence in their team’s chances to take the crown. In spite of being in the heat of the NL Wild Card race just 7% of San Francisco fans meanwhile think their young Giants team can win the Series.

Shifting attention from the diamond to the gridiron NFL fans are split between reigning champion Pittsburgh and previously undefeated New England for who will win this season’s Super Bowl. Winners of two of the past four Lombardi Trophies the Steelers bring in 14% of football fans, whereas the Patriots no doubt benefiting from the return of star quarterback Tom Brady match that figure.

The tough NFC East features three teams garnering measurable confidence from observers. The 2007 Super Bowl champion New York Giants rank third in the survey overall with just over 8% of NFL followers thinking they can win their second title in three years. Perhaps do to their overall popularity the Dallas Cowboys also draw support from 8% of the football community. The Cowboys missed the playoffs last season and are without star receiver Terrell Owens for 2009. The Philadelphia Eagles meanwhile draw just 4% of those polled in spite of some big preseason expectations and the signing of QB Michael Vick.

2006 Super Bowl champion Indianapolis Colts rank fifth overall at 7%. Also now ahead of the Eagles are the Minnesota Vikings (5%) the team the Birds knocked off in the first round of last year’s playoffs and who have recently added future Hall of Fame QB Brett Favre. Last season the Arizona Cardinals nearly won the Super Bowl, but a 9-7 record didn’t instill much confidence that they can climb to the summit in 2009 as just 3% of football fans like their chances to win it all. In fact 82% of Cardinals fans think their team will take the title, the most optimistic lot in all of football meaning very few outside of the Arizona fan base give this team much of a chance.

In terms of fan base confidence, the Patriots and Steelers rank second and third with percentages of 79 and 77% respectively. The Giants and Cowboys also have very optimistic fan bases as 60% of each think their team will take the title. Lastly when asked the question of who NFL fans would like to see win the Super Bowl, the Pittsburgh Steelers were tops at 12%, followed by the Patriots and Cowboys at 10%, the Giants at 8% and 6% of football fans pulling for an Eagles or Colts victory.

Survey: Current partisan trends are balanced by political extremes

Does having more self described moderates make for a more centrist America? It’s tough to tell really, but from analyzing some recent partisan trends the answer is probably “no”.

Rasmussen Reports updated their partisan trends for the recently completed month of August. In spite of a rough political month for President Obama the number of Americans identifying themselves as Democrats rebounded slightly with the percentage of Republicans suffering a small drop in turn. Currently 37.3% of the country are Democrats or leaning towards the Democratic Party and 32.6% of voters are self-described Republicans.

What is more interesting is the increase in unaffiliated voters. Now at 30.2% unaffiliateds are at their highest total in over two years, although as Rasmussen points out it is not unusual to see an increase in those not affiliating with either major party in off-election years such as 2009. Still unaffiliated Americans are currently a larger block of voters than in recent years overall. Since 2004 the unaffiliated average of 28.5% is noticeably lower than the 30.2% currently being measured. This would include three even-numbered election years and a little less than three total odd or off-election years.

The large block of unaffiliated voters is reflected in the increasingly negative views many Americans hold of the two major parties. A recent Pew Research poll of over 2,000 adults nationwide finds the favorable ratings for each party falling below 50%. The Democratic Party is currently at 49% with an unfavorable rating of 41%. Worse yet for the Dems, the number of Americans holding a “very” unfavorable view of the party outnumbers those who hold a very favorable by a margin of 16-12%.

The news is even worse for the GOP. Just 7% of Pew survey responders claimed to hold a very favorable opinion of the Republican Party against 18% who were very unfavorable. In total the overall GOP approval ratings hover at just 40% with 50% viewing the party negatively.

In spite of apparent dissatisfaction with the two major parties and with a large number of unaffiliated voters most Americans remain sharply divided ideologically speaking. Although white-Caucasians make up nearly two-thirds of the U.S. population very few occupy the middle ground or moderate range of their respective parties. According to a just released Gallup survey only 6% of racially white Americans are self-described conservative Democrats, with only 11% of white’s claiming to be liberal Republicans.

Conversely both parties are still composed largely of voters from their respective political extremes. White liberal Democrats are 25% of their party’s population with conservative Caucasian Republicans making up 23% of the GOP. In terms of demographics the wealthier and more educated a Democrat is the more they tend to be ideologically liberal. The correlation of the number of liberals in the Republican Party is a bit more statistically hazy. Like Democrats more Republicans claim to have a liberal political slant as you go higher in income levels, but in terms of education considerably more college graduates are liberal (12.3%) than those who hold post-graduate degrees (9.9%). This differs from trends in the Democratic Party.

In conclusion there appears to be much stability in terms of party affiliation and political ideology in spite of the historically low approval numbers both the Democratic and Republican Party’s are currently receiving. As mentioned previously conservatives outnumber liberals by a steady margin both in Pennsylvania and nationally and Democrats meanwhile are consistently more numerous than Republicans. It’s easy to argue that this helps to create a healthy sense of balance. However the balance that persists in American politics is weighed mostly by ideological weights on the far end of either side of the political see-saw not by stable forces joining in the middle.

Americans remain both relatively equal in numbers and divided in mindset.